I was able to find this one that still works
SHADOW G@TE – FULL FILM
InfoWars is in contact with Millie Weaver. We are closely monitoring the situation as it develops. To support her, please visit Ezra Levant’s Go Fund Me: https://gf.me/u/yqjnrk
The swamp is a multifaceted flora and fauna. Shadowgate is the tool. To understand the tools we have to know who is using the tools as well. The Wexner inclusion is necessary to understand that the players go far back. Farther than even Soros.
Head of the Snake – Wexner, Maxwell’s, Mossad & Mega Group Exposed
849,411 views•Jun 6, 202018K1.3KSHARESAVE
Court orders Wexner documents unsealed in Jeffrey Epstein-related case against Dershowitz
By Kevin G. Hall, Miami Herald, Tribune News ServicePosted Aug 12, 2020 at 7:39 AM
WASHINGTON — A federal judge has ordered the unsealing and release of correspondences from attorneys for celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz and retail magnate Leslie Wexner, who developed Victoria’s Secret into a worldwide brand, in a defamation case that is likely to reveal more about the secretive life of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled Monday that there was no cause to conceal the legal requests and responses and set an Aug. 17 date for a hearing on whether Wexner can be forced to testify in a defamation case involving one of Epstein’s victims, Virginia Roberts Giuffre.
———————me—a bit of research on Loretta Preska——–
ca. Apr. 15, 2001, C.I.A. whistleblower Susan Lindauer warned American senior leadership that “I first learned of the 9/11 Conspiracy from my CIA handler, Dr. Richard Fuisz, in mid-April, 2001.” Lindauer Affidavit, Tr. 3:22-24.
Lindauer testified: “Throughout the summer of 2001, we were convinced the Twin Towers would be demolished, using a combination of explosives with the airplanes.” Tr. 6:8-10.
“I made one fatal mistake. I requested to testify through proper channels … I should have known better than to trust Congress. Thirty days after I phoned the Offices of John McCain and Senator Trent Lott, I woke to find the FBI pounding on my front door. At that point, I gained a new distinction as the second non-Arab American arrested on the Patriot Act, facing secret charges, secret evidence and secret grand jury testimonay. I was held under indictment for five years without a Trial–and thrown in prison on Carswell Air Foce Base in Texas for a year, without a hearing.” Tr. 18:4-5; 17-25.
C.I.A. Whisteblower Susan Lindauer: “To Washington’s greatest shame, the Patriot Act, which Congress proclaimed a key judicial weapon to break up terrorism in the United States, was first used to stop a whistle blower from telling the truth about 9/11 and Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence.” Tr. 18: 26-30.
As a result of this testimony Lindauer was declared mentality unfit—a tactic thought to have passed into history after it was exposed as a commonly used way to muzzle dissent in the former Soviet Union, replete with corrupt judges willing to falsely imprison targets on fabricated KGB charges. In Lindauer’s case, her C.I.A.-compliant Judge Mukasey became Bush Jr.’s Attorney General as a reward.
To silence Lindauer’s testimony to the 9/11 Commission, Lindaeur was only the second non-Arab to be prosecuted under The Patriot Act. She was arrested on Mar. 11, 2004 and assigned to the corrupt Southern District of New York and Judge Michael B. Mukasey. George Bush later appointed Mukasey as Attorney General on Nov. 09, 2007.
Lindauer was held without a trial or even a hearing at Carswell Air Force Base (incarcerated in 2005) and ruled to be mentally unfit to stand trial. . The government tried to administer psychtropic drugs to further incapacate her frstimony on 9/11. She was released to Judge Loretta Preska in 2007. In 2008, a blogger began publicizing her illegal incarceration. The government dropped charges on Jan. 15, 2009. She published a book on her ordeal titled Extreme Prejudice and is now a government corruption critic
Preska wrote that she saw “no reason for that correspondence to remain under seal,” and told the parties to file their respective letters on the public docket, which happened Monday afternoon. The documents show that Dershowitz alleges that Giuffre — who is suing him for defamation — is trying to extort money from him because of his relationship as a longtime friend to and lawyer for Epstein. And Dershowitz wants Wexner and his attorney John Zeiger to testify that they had privately settled a similar claim threatened by Giuffre.
Dershowitz, who is countersuing Giuffre, was not only friends with Epstein, but as his lawyer was instrumental in negotiating a non-prosecution agreement more than a decade ago that absolved Epstein, his close associates and unnamed others of potential federal charges of sex trafficking.
The deal, blessed by then-U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida Alexander Acosta, proved highly controversial, and last year the U.S. attorney for Southern New York ignored it as he filed sex trafficking charges against the multimillionaire. Epstein was found dead by hanging in his jail cell as he awaited trial, scuttling efforts by the feds to have him implicate other prominent men.
In a June 23 letter to the judge, attorneys for Dershowitz noted they had served subpoenas in June on Wexner and Zeiger, and asked Preska to compel them to provide for “the production of a small number of documents directly relevant to the central allegation in this case that Plaintiff [Giuffre] falsely accused Professor Dershowitz of sexual abuse as part of a scheme to extort Wexner.”
Giuffre is the most prominent of the numerous women alleging sexual abuse while underage at the hands of Epstein. She says she was lured to Epstein by British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, who was arrested on July 2, and forced into sexual servitude over a four-year-period, coerced into sleeping with powerful men, including Britain’s Prince Andrew and Dershowitz. Both men deny the claim.
In her response, Giuffre argued through a lawyer that Dershowitz has made the false allegation against her and for that reason she too wants to ask questions of Wexner.
“Defendant has put Leslie Wexner at the heart of his false and defamatory claims that Plaintiff and her counsel were engaged in an extortion plot to extract money from wealthy associates of Jeffrey Epstein by allegedly falsely naming the Defendant,” Charles J. Cooper, attorney with the firm Cooper & Kirk, which represents Giuffre in the defamation case, wrote in a July 28 letter to Preska.
Giuffre’s attorney zeroed in on the Dershowitz claim that Wexner was framed for financial reasons.
“For this reason, Plaintiff was likewise planning on seeking relevant documents and testimony from Mr. Wexner and Mr. Zeiger. Plaintiff, therefore, respectfully requests that the Court allow these depositions to proceed,” he wrote.
Wexner, now 83 and largely out of public view, is fighting to stay out of this matter. Epstein for a long stretch managed Wexner’s personal finances and those of his family charities. At one point, Epstein had broad power-of-attorney over the finances of Wexner, who grew wealthy through groundbreaking retail brands, including The Limited and Victoria’s Secret. Dershowitz is asking Judge Preska to compel Wexner to provide information on any correspondence between Wexner or Zeiger with Giuffre and her lawyers, past and present.
Through his attorney Zeiger, Wexner said he has no relevant information that could be used in a trial. No correspondence from Zeiger was released by the judge, but Dershowitz’s lawyers included a lengthy back-and-forth email chain that showed Wexner would cooperate only if compelled.
Lawyers for Dershowitz told the judge he was not worried about trial right now, just a legal stage called discovery, the pre-trial process where each side can seek obtain evidence that the other claims to have.
“Professor Dershowitz will address the admissibility of testimony obtained from Wexner at the appropriate time, upon a complete discovery record including being able to offer the Court Wexner’s actual testimony, as opposed to his lawyer’s self-serving characterization of what it will be,” Howard M. Cooper, an attorney with Todd & Weld, which is representing Dershowitz, wrote in a July 31 letter to the judge unsealed Monday.
Preska ordered the parties to discuss what exactly they are seeking from each other and file briefs with her by Thursday, four days before she hears them in a telephonic hearing.
——————-me–this article relates to what may ACTUALLY come out of this hearing
Likud Lawmaker Accuses Wexner Foundation of ‘Poisoning the Minds’ of Beneficiaries
Karhi accuses U.S.-based foundation of ‘clear left-wing bias,’ alleging that its funding came from late convicted sex offender Jeffrey EpsteinShare in FacebookShare in TwitterSend in e-mailSend in e-mailZen ReadPrint article
Truly understand the Middle East. Haaretz.com
JUST $1 FOR THE FIRST MONTHSUBSCRIBE
Karhi at a session of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, in June 2020.Credit: Knesset spokesperson / Shmulik GrosmanJonathan LisGet email notification for articles from Jonathan LisFollowPublished on 15.07.2020
The Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee held a hearing on Wednesday on the activities in Israel of the U.S.-based Wexner Foundation, during which a right-wing lawmaker accused the foundation of political bias and “poisoning the minds” of program participants.
The session, which was convened at the request of Likud Knesset member Shlomo Karhi, officially dealt with cooperation between Israel and the foundation, which funds a program to train senior members of the Israeli public service. In practice, however, Karhi sought to undermine the foundation’s operations.
At the hearing, Karhi accused the foundation of working to spread “anti-democratic poison that will infiltrate the minds of our most senior civil servants.” The foundation, he alleged, “has a clear left-wing bias.” The cost of the program per student, he claimed, is 1 million shekels ($291,000). “Won’t any of the graduates feel obligated to [the foundation] for many years?” he asked.
Karhi also made reference to the millions of shekels which, according to reports, former Prime Minister and Defense Minister Ehud Barak received from the foundations for studies that he was commissioned to carry out. “Did Barak do anything for the foundation at the Defense Ministry?” Karhi insinuated. “Did the foundation ask him to do anything for it?”
Karhi also raised allegations of the involvement of the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in the Columbus, Ohio-based foundation, stating that Epstein had been a vice president of the foundation. Karhi added that, despite denials from the foundation that Epstein personally contributed to the foundation, there is documentation that he contributed at least $9.5 million.
“Would anyone think it appropriate for Israel to receive support from a foundation whose resources came from pedophiles?” the Likud lawmaker asked.
Yisrael Beiteinu Knesset member Eli Avidar slammed Karhi over his allegations, questioning the reliability of his information and adding that “defaming the graduates of the foundation is a crime.”
- Ehud Barak Received $2.3 Million for Two Studies, One Was Not Completed, Wexner Foundation Says
- Jeffrey Epstein and Jewish Philanthropist Leslie Wexner’s Relationship, Explained
- Does Ehud Barak Have Any More Jeffrey Epsteins in His Closet?
The Wexner Foundation issued a statement in response to condemn “the delegitimization campaign that aims to harm the program its mission to enrich the senior management in public service.”
“The foundation management disgustedly rejects the claim that the foundation functions from any political considerations, and that can be attested to by hundreds of graduates from various backgrounds and points of view,” the foundation said. “The Wexner Foundation management sees this as a worrying and serious attempt to harm a foundation that from its inception has acted from pure Zionistic motivations and will make every effort to ensure that the public service training program, among the most successful and high-quality in Israel, will continue for many years to come.”
The Wexner Foundation was founded in 1980 and among its other activities runs training programs for senior Israeli public servants in cooperation with Harvard University. The graduates of the program reportedly include Supreme Court Justice Uzi Vogelman, Israeli army Chief of Staff Aviv Kochavi, and former State Prosecutor Moshe Lador.
Over the past two years, the foundation has come under major attack from the Israeli right-wing with allegations that it is “engineering” the outlook of the program’s graduates and encouraging left-wing views among senior public servants in Israel.
Another focus of the criticism is the $2.9 million in consulting fees that the foundation reportedly paid Barak. Following several years in which Barak and the foundation refused to provide details about what services were rendered in exchange, last week the foundation disclosed that one of Barak’s studies related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict while another, on the subject of leadership, was never completed. The content of the research has not been released.