The people banning WHITE people from speaking are the racists themselves and don’t have the observational fortitude necessary to realize that WHITE is a color too. And deserving of voice. What has the 20 year old done to anyone?
These people want to PUNISH the only RACE that has ever RECOGNIZED that ALL people deserve freedom. And FOR this they want to punish? Especially AMERICA, the place where a WAR was fought and family blood spilled to RECOGNIZED the humanity in ALL races.
Now, specifically, why punish a 20 year old? The punishment of the last 20 years? The last 20 years these children have never held any race or color (really it’s only color, because we are all humans) high, but HAVE been scolded into lowering the white. Why?
Why punish the already demoralized youth for something their ancestors did? And did they? Who sold slaves? Where was this practiced? Where is it still -NOW- practiced? It’s not in the WEST. So, the WEST is punished? The YOUTH of the west is punished? Why?
WHY IS the COLOR white punished?
Yes, there were some horrors of whites owning slaves. BUT there isn’t still SHAME for the “colors” that STILL TRADE their own (Africans, Muslims, and whatever else) in it? STILL today? no? why?
Maybe the WHITE BASHING is only the result of the SHAME of the “COLORED.” I write this in meaning all other cultures, really, than the WEST. What color is the WEST? The WEST, by the way, is all colored. I’m using “their” language. The language of the NONE western RACIST when I write “colored.”
So, why is the youth of the WEST to blame?
The WEST is the IDEOLOGY of freedom. That includes ALL colors. And by excluding a COLOR, is the road to the IDEOLOGY that enslaved the world. BUT maybe the UNIVERSITY – the elite – WANT to go toward enslaving a people BECAUSE the elite are always the TASKMASTERS. THEY are the CRACKERS and worse yet, the WANNABE crackers. The future Masters of the NEW (OLD) WORLD ORDER.
Anti-racism event hosted by Edinburgh University bans white people from asking questions
Edinburgh university buildings CREDIT: ALAMY
The conference has been organised by the Resisting Whiteness group which opposes racism and describes itself as a QTPOC (queer and trans people of colour) organisation.
There will be two “safe spaces” at the event one of which white people will be barred from entering.
The safe places are meant for those who feel “overwhelmed/overstimulated or uncomfortable”.
A blurb for the “conference, talks and workshops” at the city’s Pleasance Theatre, which aim to “amplify the voices of people of colour, says: “We will therefore not be giving the microphone to white people during the Q&As, not because we don’t think white people have anything to offer to the discussion, but because we want to amplify the voices of people of colour.
“If you are a white person with a question, please share it with a member of the committee or our speakers after the panel discussion.”
Questions explored during the conference will include “what does it mean to be a queer and/or trans person of colour in a society that frequently does not want to see us?”.
However, Jane McColl, an anti-racism campaigner, said the event itself was “blatantly racist”, adding: “It sets back the battle to achieve equality and fairness by decades, all because of the actions of a tiny group of extremists, whose perverse sense of logic has led them to belittle white people, not by who they are as individuals, by merely because of their skin colour.
“Imagine if this event was called ‘Resisting Blackness’ and non-white people were told they could not ask questions, nor access a room because they were the ‘wrong’ colour.”
A spokesman for the university said tackling racism was an important topic for debate but added that it placed “great value on issues around equality and voice”.
He said: “Consequently the university has met with the event organisers to ensure the event is compliant with our values.
“We have expressed our concerns to them about certain aspects of the format of the event and they are revising their ‘safe space’ policy for the conference as a result.”
Politics Religion and Family 